ARBBL

Have you decided if we are doing the ZM rules per the WD article for the 500 point games?

Tom wrote:Have you decided if we are doing the ZM rules per the WD article for the 500 point games?

I think I’ll leave it up to the players. I ran a game for Gary and Mike at 400 points and we used the normal reaction rules, they are powerful at that level but they seemed to enjoy it.

As I see it there are 3 options for your 500 game:

1. Use ZM rules on a a ZM table.
2. Use the ZM reaction rules but on a “normal” scenic table.
3. Use the core rules.

I’m happy with all three and will play whatever my opponent wants to play.

Coward

I would recommend using the zone mortals force selection and reaction limits in smaller games. I think that should stop a lot of the nonsense which would otherwise be possible.

How fixed (if at all) are the lists going to be between games?

Tom wrote:How fixed (if at all) are the lists going to be between games?

Not fixed at all, going with a pretty casual approach.

I’m hoping they do a crusade book at some point with 40k-esq crusade style rules in for a more structured campaign, this is just about getting stuff built and (hopefully) painted whilst playing games along the way.

Hi all,

Plan is to move to 750 point games from 7th Feb, get building!

Cheers,
Dave

Hi all,

Plan is to move to 1,000 point games from the 9th May.

Cheers,
Dave